Skip to main content

Windows 8 vs Windows 7 – Who’s The Quickest?

 

Posted on Everything Microsoft - Latest Microsoft News, Guides, Reviews & Themes

It’s expected at this stage that each new edition of Windows will be “quicker, lighter and more powerful” than the previous version. But how often do we hear all these claims only to find that a lot of the time they are just a lot of hot air?

One such claim is that Microsoft promised 15 second boot times with Windows 7, and while it is dramatically quicker than its predecessors’, it’s practically impossible to achieve these start up times without specially optimised hardware. However, with Windows 8 Microsoft have promised the same thing, only this time it seems to be true.

PCMag decided to pitch Microsoft’s latest operating system – Windows 8 – against it’s predecessor – Windows 7. All these speed test were carried out on the same Toshiba Portege R835-P88 laptop with a 2.5GHz Core i5 chip, 6GB of RAM , 500GB harddrive and Intel HD 3000 graphics. They set the machine up with a clean install of Windows 7 64bit and then Windows 8 64bit.

Windows 8 Redefined PC experience1 Windows 8 vs Windows 7   Whos The Quickest?

Windows 7 vs Windows 8

So who won?

  Windows 7 Utimate
(64-bit)

Windows 8
(64-bit)

Startup
(seconds, lower is better)
38
17
Shutdown
(seconds, lower is better)
12.2
9.9
500MB File Group Move
(seconds, lower is better)
25.2
29.2
Large Single File Move
(seconds, lower is better)
46.4
46.8
Video Rendering
(minutes:seconds, smaller is better)
1:22 1:11
Geekbench 2.3 64-bit tests
(higher is better)
8090
8187
Geekbench 2.3 32-bit tests
(higher is better)
5962 6122
PCMark 7
(higher is better)
2313 2701
Sunspider
(ms, lower is better)
180 144
Google V8 (v.7)
(higher is better)
3079 6180
Psychedelic Browsing
(higher is better)
3997 5292

As you can see from these results above, in PCMag’s testing, Windows 8 practically won all around. What’s particularly impressive is the start up times. Windows 8 has cut the start up time in half down to a speedy 17 seconds. The reason being that Windows 8 saves a copy of the system state and memory contents to the harddrive and then simply reloads this once you restart. This is why it’s so much quicker at starting up as it doesn’t have to go and load everything from scratch.

We can also expect to see this start up time reduced even further when new laptops, tablets, PCs etc.. are released with SSD hard drives and UEFI that will dramatically improve these start up times even further.

It’s also quite apparent that Microsoft have worked hard on improving the browser performance in Windows 8. Internet Explorer 10 was miles ahead of IE 9. The javascript engine has been dramatically been improved and optimised. Sunspider and Google’s V8 tests show a big improvement in load times and processing times which is great news for us all.

The PCMark 7 benchmark test which runs 7 different systems tests that are designed to test out everything also shows a big performance increase in Windows 8. In PCMags test, Windows 8 was up by 388 points.

Head over to PCMag if you want to check out the full post in a bit more detail.

It’s good to see that there is some real significant improvement with Windows 8 over Windows 7, and bear in mind that this is still not the final release of Windows 8. We can only expect that Microsoft are busy tweaking the final few lines of code to get every last bit of performance out of Windows 8.

Source:

PcMag

Windows 8 vs Windows 7 – Who’s The Quickest? was posted on Everything Microsoft - Latest Microsoft News, Guides, Reviews & Themes. If you are not reading this content in an email newsletter, it is being used without permission.


Windows 8 vs Windows 7 – Who’s The Quickest?
Robert Boland
Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:32:29 GMT

Popular posts from this blog

Apple will disconnect ‘obsolete’ first-gen Apple TV from iTunes in May

Apple has announced today it will drop iTunes support for some older devices from May 25. This includes the first generation Apple TV, and also any PC running Windows XP or Vista. The company is introducing new security changes which will prevent those devices from using the latest version of iTunes.
Apple says that the original Apple TV is an "obsolete Apple product" and will not be updated to support security changes. Only those with the second generation of Apple TV or later will be able to access the iTunes store.
Windows XP or Vista users won't be able to use the latest version of iTunes, but older Windows computers can still use previous versions without support from Apple. Those who do so, however, won't be able to make new purchases or re-download previous purchases on that computer. If you're on on XP or Vista, you'll need to upgrade to Windows 7 or later to continue using iTunes normally.
The writing was already on the wall for these devices: Wi…

BBM Desktop is now a thing for Android BBM beta users!

With BlackBerry Blend having met an arguably early demise, folks looking to use BBM on their desktop have been out of luck. That might soon change, though, as the latest BBM beta release for Android has a BBM Desktop mode.

With BlackBerry Blend having met an arguably early demise, folks looking to use BBM on their desktop have been out of luck with no desktop application available. That will soon be changing, though, as the latest BBM beta release for Android has introduced a new way to bring BBM to your desktop.
Read More »

https://crackberry.com/bbm-desktop-now-thing-bbm-beta-users

Windows 10: Microsoft retires HomeGroup

Microsoft plans to remove the HomeGroup functionality from its Windows 10 operating system. The company made the first step towards that goal in the most recent Insider Preview version of Windows 10 as it disabled it in that build.
In "a note about HomeGroup" in the release announcement of the Windows 10 Insider Build, Microsoft confirms that HomeGroup will be retired.
The company introduced HomeGroup in Windows 7 as a new option for home users to access printers, files, and media in home networks. The core idea was to assign all devices to a single HomeGroup to share access to files and printers between all devices.
It is unclear how popular the feature was and is. It is clear however that it was never the only option that Windows users had in this regard, and it was not the best either for certain use cases. You could not add Mac OS X or Linux devices to a HomeGroup for instance.
The end of HomeGroup
Easily connecting to and sharing the important pieces of your digi…